Mississippi Gun Owners banner

3881 - 3900 of 3917 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
820 Posts
And we are supposed to believe them.
I don't believe the WHO.

I believe the Wuhan bat virus reporting of European countries.

I don't believe any Wuhan bat virus reporting out of China, N. Korea or Russia.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,102 Posts
In the United States over 5,000,000 people have recovered from COVID-19.

As I watch the news, I only see mentions of the case numbers and death numbers.

Please spread the recovery number as well, as without it you are not telling the whole story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BasMstr and 2A_1791

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
820 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
195 Posts

Coronavirus: WHO backflips on virus stance by condemning lockdowns
Lockdowns have been used to control the coronavirus around the world, plunging millions of lives into chaos. Now the WHO has changed its mind.
OCTOBER 11, 20204:19PM
WHO’s huge lockdown backflip (VIDEO: The Spectator)
WHO’s huge lockdown backflip (VIDEO: The Spectator)




The World Health Organisation has backflipped on its original COVID-19 stance after calling for world leaders to stop locking down their countries and economies.
Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method” of the coronavirus.
He also claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty – with no mention of the potential lives saved.
“Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer,” he said.
RELATED: WHO’s chilling coronavirus warning
RELATED:
WHO reveals who should receive vaccine first
Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method”.

Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method”.Source:Twitter


“We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Dr Nabarro told The Spectator.
“The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganise, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
Dr Nabarro’s main criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected.
“Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean, for example, or in the Pacific because people aren’t taking their holidays,” he said.
“Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. … Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”
Melbourne’s lockdown has been hailed as one of the strictest and longest in the world. In Spain’s lockdown in March, people weren’t allowed to leave the house unless it was to walk their pet. In China, authorities welded doors shut to stop people from leaving their homes. The WHO thinks these steps were largely unnecessary.
Instead, Dr Nabarro is advocating for a new approach to containing the virus.
“And so, we really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method. Develop better systems for doing it. Work together and learn from each other.”
The WHO’s criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected. Picture: Christopher Black/AFP

The WHO’s criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected. Picture: Christopher Black/AFPSource:AFP
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
820 Posts

Coronavirus: WHO backflips on virus stance by condemning lockdowns
Lockdowns have been used to control the coronavirus around the world, plunging millions of lives into chaos. Now the WHO has changed its mind.
OCTOBER 11, 20204:19PM
WHO’s huge lockdown backflip (VIDEO: The Spectator)
WHO’s huge lockdown backflip (VIDEO: The Spectator)




The World Health Organisation has backflipped on its original COVID-19 stance after calling for world leaders to stop locking down their countries and economies.
Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method” of the coronavirus.
He also claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty – with no mention of the potential lives saved.
“Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer,” he said.
RELATED: WHO’s chilling coronavirus warning
RELATED:
WHO reveals who should receive vaccine first
Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method”.

Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method”.Source:Twitter


“We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Dr Nabarro told The Spectator.
“The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganise, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
Dr Nabarro’s main criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected.
“Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean, for example, or in the Pacific because people aren’t taking their holidays,” he said.
“Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. … Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”
Melbourne’s lockdown has been hailed as one of the strictest and longest in the world. In Spain’s lockdown in March, people weren’t allowed to leave the house unless it was to walk their pet. In China, authorities welded doors shut to stop people from leaving their homes. The WHO thinks these steps were largely unnecessary.
Instead, Dr Nabarro is advocating for a new approach to containing the virus.
“And so, we really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method. Develop better systems for doing it. Work together and learn from each other.”
The WHO’s criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected. Picture: Christopher Black/AFP

The WHO’s criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected. Picture: Christopher Black/AFPSource:AFP

Coronavirus: WHO backflips on virus stance by condemning lockdowns
Lockdowns have been used to control the coronavirus around the world, plunging millions of lives into chaos. Now the WHO has changed its mind.
OCTOBER 11, 20204:19PM
WHO’s huge lockdown backflip (VIDEO: The Spectator)
WHO’s huge lockdown backflip (VIDEO: The Spectator)




The World Health Organisation has backflipped on its original COVID-19 stance after calling for world leaders to stop locking down their countries and economies.
Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method” of the coronavirus.
He also claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty – with no mention of the potential lives saved.
“Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer,” he said.
RELATED: WHO’s chilling coronavirus warning
RELATED:
WHO reveals who should receive vaccine first
Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method”.

Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO appealed to world leaders yesterday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method”.Source:Twitter


“We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Dr Nabarro told The Spectator.
“The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganise, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
Dr Nabarro’s main criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected.
“Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean, for example, or in the Pacific because people aren’t taking their holidays,” he said.
“Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. … Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”
Melbourne’s lockdown has been hailed as one of the strictest and longest in the world. In Spain’s lockdown in March, people weren’t allowed to leave the house unless it was to walk their pet. In China, authorities welded doors shut to stop people from leaving their homes. The WHO thinks these steps were largely unnecessary.
Instead, Dr Nabarro is advocating for a new approach to containing the virus.
“And so, we really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method. Develop better systems for doing it. Work together and learn from each other.”
The WHO’s criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected. Picture: Christopher Black/AFP

The WHO’s criticism of lockdowns involved the global impact, explaining how poorer economies that had been indirectly affected. Picture: Christopher Black/AFPSource:AFP
And ... crickets about this from the DemocRATs and the MSM.

WHO has 'covered' both red and black now.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
820 Posts
243209


A curious thing happened on October 2. In fact, it was so curious, America's mainstream media completely ignored it. That's the day Dr. Mike Ryan, director of the World Health Organization's health emergencies program, stated that an estimated 750 million, or 10% of the world's population, had contracted coronavirus. Furthermore, according to the WHO's website, approximately one million people have died. Thus, according the WHO's own data, the mortality rate for coronavirus is 0.13%.

If that rate seems familiar, maybe it's because it's the exact same mortally rate as the seasonal flu, according to data from the CDC
— and for decades, America and the rest of world have approached the flu exactly as Thomas Sowell has described. Some people get flu shots, most stay home when they're sick, and tens of thousands of the most vulnerable pay the ultimate price, even as the world soldiers on around them.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
820 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,862 Posts
Thus, according the WHO's own data, the mortality rate for coronavirus is 0.13%.

If that rate seems familiar, maybe it's because it's the exact same mortally rate as the seasonal flu, according to data from the CDC
— and for decades, America and the rest of world have approached the flu exactly as Thomas Sowell has described. Some people get flu shots, most stay home when they're sick, and tens of thousands of the most vulnerable pay the ultimate price, even as the world soldiers on around them.
Once again, you are using mortality rate as the key indicator. That is NOT the most important statistic. It is the number of people that this virus hospitalizes and incapacitates that makes it far more dangerous than the seasonal flu.
 

·
Rational Anarchist
Joined
·
14,191 Posts
The real data I want to have is what the current mortality is among people receiving the latest widely available treatments. The average mortality over the course of the virus is pointless because early on they were still figuring it out.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,862 Posts
Once again, you don't wear a mask to protect yourself. You wear a mask to protect others from you. Another example of the media trying to make a statistic into something that it is not.
 

·
μολὼν λαβέ
Joined
·
35,506 Posts
Once again, you don't wear a mask to protect yourself. You wear a mask to protect others from you. Another example of the media trying to make a statistic into something that it is not.
Yeah because it only works one way. Thats the most dang absurd thing they ever lied about. If you are a person that thinks they may be affected stay at home don't force me to do something under the guise of it protecting you. And I guess all the health providers before this wearing masks was to protect all the sick people they was treating, and not because it actually protects them from catching whatever.

So how long until they tell us all to turn in our guns ? Cause you know its not for my protection its to protect the general public.

SMDH
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
820 Posts
Red flag laws, gun swatting ... mask(less) swatting ... it's all the same, and pretty much by the same people.

JMO.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,663 Posts
Well, the skinny neighbor's husband went back to the office to work Monday a week ago. That would be Oct 5th, 2020. Hey, that would be last Monday. Her 2 sons went back to school yesterday, Oct 13, 2020, this Tuesday, not last Tuesday, that would have been Oct 6th, 2020. She sent me a text, fever 100, I'm staying away from the fence for a few days.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,712 Posts
For all the mask protect others crowd why dont you do some research or at least watch this.


How many times do we have to be told that the mask do not work? They have said it repeatedly and there are studies showing it does little to nothing for source control. I have linked to these studies previously so go look and quit being sheep.
 
3881 - 3900 of 3917 Posts
Top