Mississippi Gun Owners banner
1 - 20 of 26 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
5,793 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
Army Plans to Field H&K G28 as New Squad Marksman Rifle


The Heckler & Koch G28 7.62mm rifle was selected by the U.S. Army in 2016 to become the new Compact Semi-Automatic Sniper System. (Courtesy Heckler & Koch)
Military.com 6 Mar 2018 By Matthew Cox
A senior Army modernization official today said that the service's new Squad Designated Marksman Rifle will be the 7.62mm Heckler & Koch G28.

The Army selected the G28 as its new Compact Semi-Automatic Sniper System in 2016 to replace its M110 Semi-automatic Sniper System -- a move that will provide snipers with a shorter rifle that doesn't stick out to the enemy as a sniper weapon.


Now the Army plans to start fielding the G28 in 2018 to infantry squads as the service's standard SDMR, Lt. Gen. John Murray, deputy chief of staff for Army G8, told Military.com.

The Army has money in the fiscal 2018 budget earmarked for the SDMR program, said Murray, who did not have the exact figure listed in the budget.

Equipping squads with a new 7.62mm SDMR is the first step in a two-phase effort to ensure units have the capability to penetrate enemy body armor.

Last May, Gen. Mark Milley testified to the Senate Armed Services Committee that the service's current M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round will not defeat enemy body armor plates similar to the U.S. military-issue rifle plates such as the Enhanced Small Arms Protective Insert, or ESAPI.

The revelation launched an ad hoc effort to acquire new 7.62mm Interim Service Combat Rifle, mainly for infantry units, but the idea quickly lost momentum.

Then in early February, Murray told members of Congress that the new SDMR is a phase one; phase two would be to field a more powerful replacement to the M249 squad automatic weapon, which is chambered for 5.56mm.

The presence of a 7.62mm rifle in the squad formation is nothing new, but units currently have to turn in their SDMRs at the end of a combat deployment.

Since 2009, the Army's SBR has been the Enhanced Battle Rifle 14, a modernized M14 equipped with a Sage International adjustable aluminum stock with pistol grip, a Leupold 3.5x10 power scope and Harris bipod legs.

The Army adopted the EBR concept, first used in 2004 by Navy SEALs, in response to the growing need of infantry squads operating in Afghanistan to engage enemy fighters at longer ranges.
 

· Gatekeeper to my corner of Hell.
Joined
·
27,881 Posts
I'm not real clear on the following yet, but I think you could join the USMC or the Army to shoot one.
Don't think that will work, I'm 21yrs too old to enlist in the Army and 28yrs too old for the Marines. LOL
 

· Registered
Over 60 years experience shooting and hunting. 40 years experience working on my personal guns.
Joined
·
7,669 Posts
I am sure that it is modern. My first thoughts were we had the M14 50 years ago and the Garand before that. Any tool that will help our soldiers defeat the enemy and get home in one piece, they should have got yesterday. Looks bad to the bone.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,764 Posts
Don't think that will work, I'm 21yrs too old to enlist in the Army and 28yrs too old for the Marines. LOL
Give it a couple of more years. Most of the boys who are of prime recruitment age are either too fat, too stupid, or too drug addicted for military service. The Army will be offering guys like us signing bonuses before much longer.
 

· Registered
Over 60 years experience shooting and hunting. 40 years experience working on my personal guns.
Joined
·
7,669 Posts
They will give you the Breath Test. If you are still breathing, you are hired.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13,016 Posts
Looks like a 16.5” barrel AR10. If they complain about the M110 SASS being too long then they should probably switch to a modern design suppressor which could cut 5-6” off oal. The current M110 suppressor is 14” and weighs 32oz!
Essentially it looks that all they have really done here is trim the barrel down from 20” to 16.5” along with a more compact suppressor, cutting 9–10” off the oal and reducing weight.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
21,268 Posts
Looks like a 16.5” barrel AR10. If they complain about the M110 SASS being too long then they should probably switch to a modern design suppressor which could cut 5-6” off oal. The current M110 suppressor is 14” and weighs 32oz!
Essentially it looks that all they have really done here is trim the barrel down from 20” to 16.5” along with a more compact suppressor, cutting 9–10” off the oal and reducing weight.
That, and tacking on a high end Schmidt and Bender scope, which will probably get trashed the first time somebody takes into combat and I don't see any BU iron sights on it. :rolleyes:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13,016 Posts
I hope the Army puts as much time and money into teaching their "Designated Marksmen" how to shoot, as they put into this $12,600/unit rifle system. :rolleyes:
I could build that rifle (minus scope) for less than 1500 easy with a 1MOA guarantee. The fact that they only guarantee 1.5MOA is sad. We have <$300 rifles that guarantee 1MOA. I know it’s the Gov, and they will always overpay big for everything, but $12,600 is ridiculous.
 

· Nocturnal Specialties
Joined
·
7,489 Posts
I could build that rifle (minus scope for less than 1500 easy. Th exact that they only guarantee 1.5MOAis sad. We have $300 rifle that guarantee 1MOA. I know it’s the Gov and they will always overpay big for everything but $12,600 is ridiculous.
Rem that 12,600 isnt just for the rifle. Its for support and such. Still crazy high but that price has alot of little stuff figured in.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
5,793 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
The adoption of the CSASS by the Marine Corps would be a major coup for the service. The Marines have struggled to adopt a much-needed replacement for the M110 and M40A5 — the latest variant on the Vietnam-era pattern that fielded to Marines during the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The service’s delay has reportedly stoked frustration among scout snipers, who complain of their rifles’ limited range and light-caliber ammo.

It’s unclear if adopting CSASS will actually allay the frustrations of the Corps’ scout snipers. Marine snipers wielding the M40A5 are accurate at a distance of up to 1,000 meters, according to Military.com. The HK G28 selected for the CSASS can only provide accurate fire at up to 600 meters.

Should the Corps end up adopting the CSASS, it’s unclear where exactly the sniper system will fit in a platoon’s arsenal. Digital gun encyclopedia Modern Firearms suggests that the CSASS is best used “as a support weapon at squad level during foot patrols.” But as recently as December, the Corps was testing a variant of the much-loved M27 Infantry Automatic Rifle for potential use in a squad designated marksman role, even though the CSASS has an extra 50 to 100 meters in range on the IAR.

All of this may be moot if the Army somehow bungles the CSASS acquisition. Though Dawson stated last September that the CSASS “has encountered no [budgetary or political] obstacles,” she told Task & Purpose today that the branch “has not yet identified production funding” for the CSASS. Whether the Marines and Air Force actually get their hands on the new sniper system depends entirely on the Army — and, in turn, whether lawmakers get their stuff together enough to give U.S. troops downrange the tools their need to get the job done.:)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
21,268 Posts
Does anyone know how they determine a effective range of a round?
Saying a 16" 7.62x51 can only provide accurate fire to 600 meters doesnt make much sense unless they are considering the 1.5 MOA at 600 yards the limit (~9.5")
There is no truly scientific method of determining this due to the many variables involved. Pretty much a WAG based on the theoretical internal, external & terminal ballistics of the rifle + ammo, and experience.
 
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top