Mississippi Gun Owners banner

Gun Group Claims Few Californians Complied With New Registration Law

1621 Views 26 Replies 11 Participants Last post by  7557
Gun Group Claims Few Californians Complied With New Registration Law

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) said the likely registration rate of “bullet-button assault weapons” was only about 3 percent of the total number of firearms in California that fall under the state’s latest expansion of its “assault weapons” ban. State documents obtained by the group through freedom of information requests show the Department of Justice approved 6,213 individuals to register 12,519 firearms under the new law by the end of June. It rejected a further 1,373 registration attempts. As of June 30, 2018, 52,443 applications for registration were pending.

The 66,335 applications for registration pale in comparison, FPC said, to the number of firearms sold between January 2000 and December 2017, which the state said must be registered by June 30, 2018. Using data on gun sales from state records and the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the group estimated there were 1.3 million firearms sold in California that would fall under the registration requirements. They estimated an additional half-million home-built firearms fall in the same category.

That would put the number of attempted registrations at about 3.6 percent of the total number of firearms required to be registered.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
21 - 27 of 27 Posts
Interstates are the yellow brick road out of the wicked witch's territory and away from the flying monkeys.
Interstates -- like tracers -- work both ways. :(
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Interstates -- like tracers -- work both ways. :(
Other than Southern border interlopers and obsessed libs, who wants to go into California these days?
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Other than Southern border interlopers and obsessed libs, who wants to go into California these days?
More homeless, more takers and more techies and actor wannabes?
More homeless, more takers and more techies and actor wannabes?
Generally don't those fit under the category of "illegals" (takers) or "obsessed libs" or they will if they want to "fit in"? I'd figure they're like someone bit by a zombie if they went in willingly and stayed these days.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Generally don't those fit under the category of "illegals" (takers) or "obsessed libs" or they will if they want to "fit in"?
But you and I repeat ourselves, don't we? ;)
  • Like
Reactions: 2
One thing to remember, there are usually large parts of any state that are rural, and in blue states are basically held hostage by a few big cities, and California is no exception. Get a little inland, and we'd have a lot in common with the regular folk there. And they are also likely the ones that own most of the guns.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
One thing to remember, there are usually large parts of any state that are rural, and in blue states are basically held hostage by a few big cities, and California is no exception. Get a little inland, and we'd have a lot in common with the regular folk there. And they are also likely the ones that own most of the guns.
I can understand the 3-California's initiative now … although, once again, judges have intervened to block it:

https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_9,_Three_States_Initiative_(2018)

I don't know if California Supreme Court judges are elected or not.
21 - 27 of 27 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top