This is a perfect example of the section I quoted. Let’s travel through Section 105.Learn me something here.
Doesnt your sections first sentence say
"Where applicable standards or requirements are not set forth. in this code.."
To me, that means if it is NOT covered by the code then the person having jurisdiction can call it like he sees it
Am i incorrect in my understanding of that verbiage?
Basically states permits may be required and types of permits that can be required. Operational would apply in this particular case.
This section merely grants that the official may group multiple permits at the same location into one if they choose.
This section defines requirements of an exhibit or trade show. What is not defined through all this is who is required to have a permit. Does the Marshall interpret all this together and group all exhibits at a single show under one permit, or do they decide that each table is required their own separate permit? Code does not define this, it simply states that the Marshall has full authority to require a permit for the operational use of a facility. Fun stuff, eh?