I’m really curious also. RUSM was the only thing I could come up with, but I don’t know anything about guns.
New Wildcat
Got with Logan at Preferred Barrels in Hildale, UT, and came up with what I considered a worthwhile undertaking.
![Ammunition Bullet Gun accessory Brass Metal]()
![Ammunition Bullet Product Gun accessory Brass]()
I'm going the opposite direction from most other builders. While the vast majority are going for something bigger and faster or something shorter and more suited for special ops engagements, I am going totally classic and utilitarian. I'm seeking to improve upon current design and optimize practicality without going through 4 or 5 steps of case forming. I wanted to use readily available and affordable components that would allow the user to keep on shooting by altering components during shortages, which WILL be coming this winter. At the same time, I didn't want to skimp on accuracy potential or performance.
The cartridges you are looking at are dummy rounds around which the chamber will be designed. The brass is available from around 10 manufacturers currently at prices starting under $0.50/case, and allows the handloader to use either small or large primers in case of shortage (usually, large rifle primers are the first to dry up). The round is designed to be fired from a lightweight, classic-styled hunting rifle with a slim barrel profile finishing nominally at 25". Ballistically, this round is designed for optimum performance out to 500 yards on deer-sized game. While utilizing bullets of optimal weight with appropriate twist, it will tout low recoil without sacrificing performance. It is projected to shoot at least 4" flatter than the .270 Winchester with 130 grain bullets at 500 yards. Design will lend to performance, low recoil, and light weight. That is the plan, anyway. I will have a prototype in hand by August 1 (if all goes as planned). It will be ideal for young or new hunters that may be worried about developing bad habits due to recoil while wanting higher-end performance only available previously from harder recoiling cartridges. It will NOT have a brake. At least, the prototype won't. Shouldn't be any need for one. Looking at using some special bedding (think Melvin Forbes) to enhance accuracy of the thinner barrels. I may be able to shave even more weight off the package if the experiments pan out. When I say lightweight, I don't mean a 4 1/2-lb New Ultra Light Arms. I think most of us who hunt the woods of the southeastern US like enough weight to keep from wiggling before the shot, but not enough to hinder us from climbing trees, jumping streams, hiking the hill country, or negotiating swamp vegetation. The first prototype will weigh in at a hefty 7 1/4 lbs or so, but will have potential to easily lose 1/2 pound or better keeping the barrel length constant. If the prototype pans out, look for the Mod 2 to be in the 6 1/2 lb realm. Initially, I am testing to see if I can substantiate my claims for the cartridge in the field vs on paper. (Everything I've learned to this point says I can.) Recoil will be on par with that of a .257 Roberts, while I will attempt to reduce felt or perceived recoil to the level of a 6XC or slightly less. This will be slightly below the level of a .243, which every dad wants to start their kid on, but really wants them into something larger thinking they will "grow out" of it (as if the .243 isn't big enough...). And then some want to put them in the wondrous 6.5 Creedmoor, but fear the recoil with most factory bullets might be a slight bit much early on, and are not in love with the moderate ballistic performance of that cartridge at practical hunting ranges. This cartridge/rifle fixes all that. Both by cartridge and rifle design.
Far too few are the times we stop to take the entire picture into consideration when choosing a platform from which to launch projectiles at deer and hogs (or whatever else for that matter). A cartridge can be designed perfectly for the job at hand, but performance and/or shootability suffers due to poor rifle design (think 6mm Remington). Conversely, a rifle may be designed flawlessly for the shooter and application, but the experience may be muted by cartridge limitations (insert whatever rifle you've had that felt and shot amazing, but you kept muttering under your breath, "Man if this were only chambered in _ _ _ _"). - Maybe your custom 6mm BR and you're on an elk or bear hunt or 1-mile competition.
The point is that the projectile and projector must be designed in unison to synergize the effects desired in terminal performance. Finally, this is the optimal cartridge/bullet weight for the most accurate, highest energy powder known to me in 40 years of shooting. The design actually perfectly lends itself to several high-energy propellants, which make the lofty claims of performance possible. Every cartridge designer/company has fudged the ballistics in the press. Many may have been tested at 12,000 ft. elevations, and/or under controlled conditions with barrel lengths longer than would be supplied on the production guns. I'm actually quoting what I firmly believe will be on the low side of the maximum performance spectrum (the least I think is potentially possible). The same barrel length and design will be used for all future builds, while testing will occur between 150' and 400' elevation in humid air and pressure generally over 30.00" of mercury.
Short action, high performance, readily available brass, dual primer size capability, light weight, accurate, weapon of choice between ages 8 - 80 (male and female) for deer-sized game (including mule deer, caribou and hogs).
Introducing the .270 SDC (Southern Deer Cartridge)! Performance of the 270 Winchester, accuracy of the 6.5 Creedmoor with less recoil and flatter 500-yard trajectory than both! The SDC will, of course, have to be fired from the Southern Deer Rifle!
Will have some photos of the prototype with some range data hopefully by mid-August or slightly before.
To be continued...
I'm going the opposite direction from most other builders. While the vast majority are going for something bigger and faster or something shorter and more suited for special ops engagements, I am going totally classic and utilitarian. I'm seeking to improve upon current design and optimize practicality without going through 4 or 5 steps of case forming. I wanted to use readily available and affordable components that would allow the user to keep on shooting by altering components during shortages, which WILL be coming this winter. At the same time, I didn't want to skimp on accuracy potential or performance.
The cartridges you are looking at are dummy rounds around which the chamber will be designed. The brass is available from around 10 manufacturers currently at prices starting under $0.50/case, and allows the handloader to use either small or large primers in case of shortage (usually, large rifle primers are the first to dry up). The round is designed to be fired from a lightweight, classic-styled hunting rifle with a slim barrel profile finishing nominally at 25". Ballistically, this round is designed for optimum performance out to 500 yards on deer-sized game. While utilizing bullets of optimal weight with appropriate twist, it will tout low recoil without sacrificing performance. It is projected to shoot at least 4" flatter than the .270 Winchester with 130 grain bullets at 500 yards. Design will lend to performance, low recoil, and light weight. That is the plan, anyway. I will have a prototype in hand by August 1 (if all goes as planned). It will be ideal for young or new hunters that may be worried about developing bad habits due to recoil while wanting higher-end performance only available previously from harder recoiling cartridges. It will NOT have a brake. At least, the prototype won't. Shouldn't be any need for one. Looking at using some special bedding (think Melvin Forbes) to enhance accuracy of the thinner barrels. I may be able to shave even more weight off the package if the experiments pan out. When I say lightweight, I don't mean a 4 1/2-lb New Ultra Light Arms. I think most of us who hunt the woods of the southeastern US like enough weight to keep from wiggling before the shot, but not enough to hinder us from climbing trees, jumping streams, hiking the hill country, or negotiating swamp vegetation. The first prototype will weigh in at a hefty 7 1/4 lbs or so, but will have potential to easily lose 1/2 pound or better keeping the barrel length constant. If the prototype pans out, look for the Mod 2 to be in the 6 1/2 lb realm. Initially, I am testing to see if I can substantiate my claims for the cartridge in the field vs on paper. (Everything I've learned to this point says I can.) Recoil will be on par with that of a .257 Roberts, while I will attempt to reduce felt or perceived recoil to the level of a 6XC or slightly less. This will be slightly below the level of a .243, which every dad wants to start their kid on, but really wants them into something larger thinking they will "grow out" of it (as if the .243 isn't big enough...). And then some want to put them in the wondrous 6.5 Creedmoor, but fear the recoil with most factory bullets might be a slight bit much early on, and are not in love with the moderate ballistic performance of that cartridge at practical hunting ranges. This cartridge/rifle fixes all that. Both by cartridge and rifle design.
Far too few are the times we stop to take the entire picture into consideration when choosing a platform from which to launch projectiles at deer and hogs (or whatever else for that matter). A cartridge can be designed perfectly for the job at hand, but performance and/or shootability suffers due to poor rifle design (think 6mm Remington). Conversely, a rifle may be designed flawlessly for the shooter and application, but the experience may be muted by cartridge limitations (insert whatever rifle you've had that felt and shot amazing, but you kept muttering under your breath, "Man if this were only chambered in _ _ _ _"). - Maybe your custom 6mm BR and you're on an elk or bear hunt or 1-mile competition.
The point is that the projectile and projector must be designed in unison to synergize the effects desired in terminal performance. Finally, this is the optimal cartridge/bullet weight for the most accurate, highest energy powder known to me in 40 years of shooting. The design actually perfectly lends itself to several high-energy propellants, which make the lofty claims of performance possible. Every cartridge designer/company has fudged the ballistics in the press. Many may have been tested at 12,000 ft. elevations, and/or under controlled conditions with barrel lengths longer than would be supplied on the production guns. I'm actually quoting what I firmly believe will be on the low side of the maximum performance spectrum (the least I think is potentially possible). The same barrel length and design will be used for all future builds, while testing will occur between 150' and 400' elevation in humid air and pressure generally over 30.00" of mercury.
Short action, high performance, readily available brass, dual primer size capability, light weight, accurate, weapon of choice between ages 8 - 80 (male and female) for deer-sized game (including mule deer, caribou and hogs).
Introducing the .270 SDC (Southern Deer Cartridge)! Performance of the 270 Winchester, accuracy of the 6.5 Creedmoor with less recoil and flatter 500-yard trajectory than both! The SDC will, of course, have to be fired from the Southern Deer Rifle!
Will have some photos of the prototype with some range data hopefully by mid-August or slightly before.
To be continued...
