I would not accept a covid vaccine if they tested it on 7 billion people!It's not but still hasn't been tested on a large scale to back up his initial findings to prove it's a actually a cure..
You still didn't answer the question would you take a vaccine that only been tested on 110 people?
AMEN and AMEN AGAIN!!If this guy (the doc) has his notes and documentation in order then this is a very good patient/case study. I'll grant the naysayers that the correlation of his medication cocktail with better results in covid patient outcomes is not the same as causation ( correlation does not always equal causation). Unless i missread this article while skimming it, these results were on patients that were hospitalized ( not all infected patients). So essentially these patients are not in the early stages of symptoms. Since that's the case a 20-40% (I'm a little unsure of how this range is so large given the small sample size and ease of follow up) reduction in death rate is pretty statistically significant. The base of this guys theory to try these drugs is sound. One is a histamine blocker which when it runs rampant is the cause of an anaphylactic reaction (which isn't that dissimilar From a cytokine cascade). I will say that those who have said that it isn't thoroughly tested are correct. However during a pandemic the time needed to have non biased/ neutrally funded/ detailed research conducted simply isn't there and small case studies where a group is given a drug and another group is not is the absolute fastest means of obtaining any information that might lead to a therapeutically relevant correlations. For people on deaths door a (lets shoot for the middle and call it a 30% reduction) nearly a 1/3 reduction in death is better than zero. It is certainly favorable to a vaccine that won't help the already infected that is years away from being truly tested. I believe the point others also made is that a drug combo of otc meds with few side effects today (with some benefit and the added bonus of millions of people having taken it for other purposes and it not killing them) is better than a rushed to market vaccine where you yourself are the case study and who really knows what the side effects will be long term because it hasn't been tested for more than 6-12 months. Also the social media outlets blocking the doctor convention is absolute bull****. Who made these guys the truth seers and gave them medical degrees. If these doctors have their notes and results with two groups of patients ( one receiving drug(s) and one not with the outcomes of all) and all the trends that they are claiming hold true across patient populations then this is so much correlation, that in this case it very nearly is causation and the censorship of that is (if indeed the this is the case) way beyond wrong...
I know your a cancer survivor and I applaud you on that. Many others have refused cemo and when with largely unproven alternative treatments and have survived also, so I guess there's more than one way to skin a cat.Because it a small scale study, while it may show promise it's just was a study of 110 people, even Dr Hogan said."Testing on a larger scale in well-controlled, rigorous trials are warranted by these favorable results, according to Hogan".
Would you take a Covid Vaccine that had only been tested on 110 people by a local Dr?
Preach on, brother.I for one will never trust a thing they(officials) ever say again.
1.5 million deaths out of 7.5 billion is no pandemic, either.0.04% mortality rate is not conducive to a "pandemic". COV-19 is just something new that has been introduced. Look at AIDS in the 80's, it was all the media rage. Now, it's like, meh.