Mississippi Gun Owners banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

· Don't let "good enough" be the enemy of perfect.
Joined
·
11,518 Posts
We had one when I was a kid (1960s).

It was very reliable, never failed to shoot.

I hated the loading from the rear---and you had to count rounds because if you put too many down the hole (and you could), the rod would not go all the way in. You had to dump the rounds and start over. Not fun in the woods.

Also, the barrel was wiggly---you could move it side to side and miss the target if you were not careful.

And the scope mount was on tin attached to the plastic stock---which was not good.

But as I recall somebody set a record that still stands hitting 1 inch wooden blocks with one. I never figured out how.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
201 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
I saw one at the Lyman gun show for $450 I could not believe it was so expensive. Are these collectable or something. I thought mine was a $100 gun. I guess I need to give it a once over and go out a shoot it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,819 Posts
I remember wanting one when I was younger, but if I remember correctly, it was more for the status than the accuracy of the rifle. Best I remember, they weren't very accurate, but they were sort of space age when they first came out. Probably one of the first plastic guns ever produced. Several of my well heeled friends had them and they really weren't very impressive shooters at all, but I still wanted one for some strange reason. I seriously doubt it would be a good competition gun, but they do appear to be good collectables and their prices continue to skyrocket. Like you said, yours has appreciated 400% and will probably continue to appreciate.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
21,635 Posts
samiam said:
Are remington nylon 66's any good for compitions
NO. Don't mean to be short but .22 competitions are all about accuracy. Far too many more rifles out there that will shoot rings around the 66 ...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
201 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
captain-03 said:
samiam said:
Are remington nylon 66's any good for compitions
NO. Don't mean to be short but .22 competitions are all about accuracy. Far too many more rifles out there that will shoot rings around the 66 ...
LOL Dont worry about hurting my feeling. 23 years in the military gave me a thick skin. I'm just looking for advice on shooting compitetions and wouild like to use some of the guns I already own.
 

· Don't let "good enough" be the enemy of perfect.
Joined
·
11,518 Posts
By the way, some were made in Brazil after Remington stopped making them in the US. And they were made with magazines and in bolt action, lever action, single shot and under barrel tubular magazine.

Here is a good article on them by Chuck Hawks on the MidWayUSA web site:

LINK

The intrinsic accuracy of my Nylon 66 was good. From a bench rest it would shoot groups comparable to the best my friends' Marlin Model 60 and Winchester Model 77 .22 autoloaders could do. However, due to its ultra-light weight and (compared to wood) flexible stock, its practical accuracy in the field was probably not as good. However, it was more reliable than other autoloaders and it would feed reliably in any strange orientation, including upside down.

Using the sling as a shooting aid, for example, would move the point of bullet impact a couple of inches to the side at 25 yards due to lateral stock flex. The springy Zytel stock made the Nylon 66 shoot away from any hard surface against which it might be rested against in the field (rocks and stumps, for example). This is true to some extent of all rifles, of course, but the effect was exaggerated by the nylon stock. And the rifle was so light that it was very hard to hold steady from unsupported positions.
 

· Registered
Over 60 years experience shooting and hunting. 40 years experience working on my personal guns.
Joined
·
7,671 Posts
I may be mistaken but I thought that the world record made with them was hitting those wooden blocks that were thrown in the air.If so they might be the best in the world for instinctive shooting.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
36 Posts
The nylon 66 has one of the worst stock triggers ever put on a rifle. There is nothing you can do to improve it either. They make a good little brush gun. Very reliable. And it helped that one of my father's school buddy was an expert (claimed by Remington to be one because he left remington to open his own shop and got calls from remington when they couldn't figure something out) on remingtons and did his best to do a tune up. They were an inexpensive semi auto.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
201 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
After doing some research I am glad dad gave me this rifle when I was 14. They are now very collectable and there is alot of talk about the cool factor of being one of the first plastic guns. they are very reliable and will last a lifetme or two with very little care.(I got a kick out of one guy saying he cleans his after shooting 1000 rounds if it needs it or not)
 
G

·
as a teenager, a buddy of mine had a nylon 66, good for shooting critters. there's only been a few remingtons made for target competition and the only one that i've seen still around is the 40X that some folks bought, i think, from the DCM.
 

· Registered
Over 60 years experience shooting and hunting. 40 years experience working on my personal guns.
Joined
·
7,671 Posts
Guys, I looked it up to see if my memory was correct, source, Wikipedia. In 1959 Tom Frye of Remington Arms Company, shot 100,004 of 100,010 , 2 and i/4 inch cubes of wood tossed in the air. It took 13 days of shooting 9 hours each day and using several Remington Nylon 66 rifles to accomplish the feat. I remember seeing the ads for the Nylon 66 rifles in Outdoor Life which I started reading at an early age. I think that they ran those ads a lot in the 1960,s.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top