Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

SBR? Or "firearm"?

Discussion in 'AR's, AK's, Silencers /Class III' started by 95 taco, Jan 11, 2018.

  1. jakeg823

    jakeg823 Distinguished Poster

    If they can defeat the ATF wanting to regulate bump fire stocks and “rate enhancement devices”(thanks NRA) then it’ll be fine. If not, they still haven’t lost much because they came out with that trigger/lower several years ago.
  2. Hoot G

    Hoot G Distinguished Poster MSGO Supporter

    I hope you're right.

    And, I guess it would be up to congress to rewrite the law, as the wording is pretty specific. "Function of the trigger" vs "pull of the trigger" seem to mean different things to lawyers.

  3. jakeg823

    jakeg823 Distinguished Poster

    You would think. But since when has the law stopped a beaurecrat?
  4. bubbat

    bubbat Gatekeeper to my corner of Hell.

    Their SBR rifles are $2K, so this one will probably be in the same price range, not something I would buy even if I could.
  5. 95 taco

    95 taco Blessed are the peacemakers

    Hmmm, their definition of rifle sure doesn't seem conducive to easy legal skirting.

    Forgot about that part, my mistake.
    I believe it would be legal for a "frame" to become a "firearm" though.

    That's a good possibility.
    jakeg823 and rigrat like this.