Nope, that is the only time you dont have to have a ffl transfer. I remember reading the law somewhere.
It's been years since I sent one back so double check. I believe if you send one to the maker, they can send it right back to you. I have done that a couple of times with no trouble but it has been years and the laws may have changed.Will_M said:Side question: If you have a manufacturer send you a gun back from repair does it still have to go through an FFL?
No it doesn't have to go thru a FFL when being returned for repairs, or when it comes back to you from the manufacturer. Logic is that it's already yours no need for you to have fill out the forms twice.Will_M said:The pictures are grainy but yes, those elongated holes in the frame are supposed to be there. That's what allows the part of the thumb safety that blocks the sear to move up and down in order to block said sear.
As far as him bumping it up, it can happen. Just as the gun recoils, if the safety is bumped up, the slide will shear it off. However It should have done more damage to the slide if that was the case.
Side question: If you have a manufacturer send you a gun back from repair does it still have to go through an FFL?
my thoughts exactly! i've never been more pleased with customer service before! my only complaint is the day of phone tag, but i was just as guilty as they were that day, except theirs was because the lines were busy, and i just kept losing my phone. Granted, the next time they call to let me know the pistol has been tested and is good to go, i may get a complete jerk, but i've spoken to the same guy everytime i've been in contact with them in the past 2 weeks, and he's been nothing but professional and polite.slabsides45 said:Sounds like the legendary crappy service Kimber is known for.... not.
i sure am glad glocks dont break. hahah jk. that stinks man
Yes, Glock did invent the Kaboom with the G22....First one I ever experienced in over 60 years of shooting was with a G22. The initial design of the disconnector, so I was told, on the Glocks allowed them to fire with the slide slightly out of battery--this was a bigger problem with the higher pressure cartridges. The G22 was not designed as a .40 but was a modified 9 mm. I would like to say, in my case, the problem was experienced in 2003 and has since been corrected.I thought Glock invented the "KABOOM"?
ha most definitely! i was worried i wouldnt be able to trust it, but barring no mishaps in my next few trips to the mag, i'm going to say its good to gocaptain-03 said:Great news!! Sounds like you are on cloud 9 NOW!!