Mississippi Gun Owners banner

What is a glock switch?

30K views 49 replies 19 participants last post by  HerrZnk  
As typical on gun forums, your asking a question to obtain some basic knowledge/information and getting cutesy, juvenile little ATF Memes or replies from people that don’t answer the question. In a nutshell, it is an extension on a modified Glock Slide Cover Plate which overrides the Trigger Bar, basically nullifying the operation of the Sear. Allowing Glock to fire as long as the Trigger is held down. Thus making it full auto and illegal. The ones made for Glocks only work on Glocks. @HerrZnk is correct in the ties to Airsoft guns.
Vance Moore
Image

Whynot Gunsmith Shop
Meridian, Mississippi
Facebook: Whynot Gunsmith Shop

Instagram: vance_gunsmith
 
more cuteness for ya

View attachment 305019


Did you actually expect this crew to take "what is a Glock switch" seriously? Really?
more cuteness for ya

View attachment 305019


Did you actually expect this crew to take "what is a Glock switch" seriously? Really?
Yes, if someone seems seriously asking for information. From a psychological standpoint I completely understand your reply. Your attempting to regain your damaged self esteem. Attempting to correct grammar (and posting cartoons) only attempts to draw attention away from original context of the post.
 
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

OH! You got me! I think I will go rub some 'tussin on my poor wounded ego. LOL


View attachment 305029
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

OH! You got me! I think I will go rub some 'tussin on my poor wounded ego. LOL


View attachment 305029
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

OH! You got me! I think I will go rub some 'tussin on my poor wounded ego. LOL


View attachment 305029
The laughing emoji is ALWAYS used in a deflective manner and to draw attention away from an incorrect/wrong statement/post. Memes are used when the recipient doesn’t have the ability to write a coherent, complete thought.
 
It’s worth mentioning: someone earlier discussed not proving intent and I didn’t see a direct response. There is a thing known as constructive intent. If you have no viable means or explanation that would result in an item not being contraband you will likely be charged and constructive intent argued against you. Couple examples to explain.

You have a safe full of ar lowers configured as long guns and not a single pistol configured lower. And no proof at least one lower was first assemble as a pistol. And you have a matching group of uppers that have barrel configuration shorter than 16 inches. The argument for constructive intent will likely be made at your arraignment.

If you a box of “filters” in your safe and the adapter to make your filters into illegal hearing protection, but no viable way to use those items in an innocent manner. They’ll be using constructive intent at you arraignment as well.

Just because you don't get caught in the act may not save your bacon on this topic.
Great answer “criminal intent” plays a large part in this. 👍🏻👍🏻👏👏👊👊
 
Ok coherent thought for you- don’t take the internet so serious and act like an ass. Might want to sonic clean your sense of humor, it doesn't seem to be working properly.
What brought you to the incorrect conclusion I was taking the internet “…so serious…”? Obviously this discussion has upset you deeply. The response to sonic clean “…your sense of humor…” makes no logical sense. It seems to be a reply made from an emotional standpoint rather that a logical one.